Course record PHIL
PHIL 2440
Symbolic Logic
University of Colorado Boulder
609 grades26 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Colin C Smith 36 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A
+9.7
B
+3.7
C
−4.1
D
−0.8
F
−8.4
Difference in percentage points.
10.0% withdrew · 4 of 40 enrolled.
Edward Barnett Shear 72 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
72 letter grades
Compare with the course
Shear vs. the course average
A
+12.5
B
−3.3
C
−2.8
D
−0.8
F
−5.6
Difference in percentage points.
6.5% withdrew · 5 of 77 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
85 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.22
Connection3.67
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.47
Grading4.42
Reflection4.27
Respect4.74
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.82
Questions4.67
Dominic T. J. Bailey 143 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
143 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bailey vs. the course average
A
+1.8
B
+5.9
C
−2.0
D
−3.6
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
12.3% withdrew · 20 of 163 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.24
Connection4.15
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.17
Reflection4.39
Respect4.93
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.85
Interaction3.98
Challenge4.83
Questions4.67
Graham James Oddie 63 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
63 letter grades
Compare with the course
Oddie vs. the course average
A
+1.4
B
−5.5
C
+1.8
D
+1.1
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
12.5% withdrew · 9 of 72 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Daniel Immerman 31 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Immerman vs. the course average
A
−5.8
B
+1.2
C
+3.6
D
−0.4
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
16.2% withdrew · 6 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.92 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Robert D Rupert 28 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rupert vs. the course average
A
−11.3
B
+7.2
C
+5.4
D
+3.5
F
−4.8
Difference in percentage points.
12.5% withdrew · 4 of 32 enrolled.
Overall4.88 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Raul Saucedo Ceballos 236 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
236 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ceballos vs. the course average
A
−4.6
B
−2.7
C
+1.1
D
+1.9
F
+4.3
Difference in percentage points.
10.9% withdrew · 29 of 265 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
103 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration3.43
Connection3.89
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.48
Reflection4.47
Respect4.81
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.13
Challenge4.72
Questions4.85
Jonathyn C Zapf 27 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration2.95
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Kieran Britt 12 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Owen Henry Forbes 32 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.15
Connection3.15
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.45
Reflection3.90
Respect4.75
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.30
Questions4.55
Amirhossein Ajalloeian 56 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.19
Connection4.13
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.64
Reflection4.68
Respect4.72
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Jason Pranaitis 13 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.10
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.20
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Amanda Michelle Loeffelholz 3 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Wen Xu 8 reported responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration2.20
Connection3.40
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.60
Reflection4.10
Respect4.00
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.50
Questions3.80
Dj Arends 9 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.10
Respect4.10
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Tyler Porter 12 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.90
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.80
Questions3.90
Paige Massey 8 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
James Marks 17 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration3.72
Connection4.12
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.46
Reflection4.39
Respect4.54
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.21
Challenge4.23
Questions4.49
Matthew Wennemann 14 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.20
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Hunter Jin 7 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration2.30
Connection3.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.30
Reflection3.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction3.30
Challenge4.00
Questions4.70
Apostolos Pittas 8 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Eunjin Hong 19 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration2.55
Connection3.85
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.30
Reflection4.35
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.15
Interaction3.85
Challenge5.00
Questions4.60
Yurong Zhu 29 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Rebecca Bailey 8 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Levi Smith 5 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.80
Questions4.40
Xingzhu Chen 8 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.20
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.