Course record PHIL
PHIL 2220
Philosophy and Law
University of Colorado Boulder
360 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score32/100
Below average
Benjamin Michael Kultgen 39 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
39 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kultgen vs. the course average
A
+29.2
B
−17.2
C
−7.1
D
−3.6
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 1 of 40 enrolled.
Overall4.62 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.88
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.58
Reflection4.72
Respect4.79
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.67
Questions4.40
Michael James Bevan 67 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bevan vs. the course average
A
+27.3
B
−11.1
C
−12.2
D
−2.1
F
−1.9
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 3 of 70 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.71
Connection4.37
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.07
Reflection4.02
Respect4.80
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.29
Questions4.52
Hye-Ryoung Kang 37 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kang vs. the course average
A
+9.2
B
+4.9
C
−6.8
D
−0.9
F
−6.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 1 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.10 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.40
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.60
Questions4.10
Eric C Brown 35 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brown vs. the course average
A
−4.6
B
+18.2
C
−9.4
D
−3.6
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
7.9% withdrew · 3 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.91
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Jay Radley Geyer 54 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
54 letter grades
Compare with the course
Geyer vs. the course average
A
−0.3
B
+2.1
C
+0.7
D
+1.9
F
−4.5
Difference in percentage points.
5.3% withdrew · 3 of 57 enrolled.
Brian Thomas Talbot 67 grades · 1 term 2.58GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Talbot vs. the course average
A
−26.4
B
+9.8
C
+10.2
D
+0.9
F
+5.6
Difference in percentage points.
8.2% withdrew · 6 of 73 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.89
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.41
Reflection4.90
Respect4.61
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.89
Questions4.88
Ajene Nicar Robinson-Burris 61 grades · 1 term 2.47GPA
61 letter grades
Compare with the course
Robinson-Burris vs. the course average
A
−22.4
B
−2.9
C
+15.6
D
+4.6
F
+5.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.7% withdrew · 3 of 64 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.55
Connection4.85
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.10
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.40
Questions4.35
Hye Ryoung Hye Kang 30 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Jasmine Rae Straight 5 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.00
Richard Alonzo Fyfe 17 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.74
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.88
Grading3.87
Reflection4.63
Respect4.20
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.03
Challenge4.10
Questions4.08
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.