Course record PHIL
PHIL 1600
Philosophy and Religion
University of Colorado Boulder
296 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score36/100
Below average
Wayne Nicholas Hardaker 37 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hardaker vs. the course average
A
+4.4
B
+13.9
C
−7.8
D
−4.4
F
−6.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.1% withdrew · 2 of 39 enrolled.
Overall4.16 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration2.30
Connection4.90
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Amanda Michelle Loeffelholz 69 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
69 letter grades
Compare with the course
Loeffelholz vs. the course average
A
+17.2
B
−7.7
C
−2.0
D
−2.9
F
−4.6
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 1 of 70 enrolled.
Overall4.88 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.80
Contribution4.85
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Stanley Matthew Stolte 35 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stolte vs. the course average
A
−0.9
B
+7.8
C
−4.9
D
−1.5
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.11 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.90
Connection3.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.60
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.00
Jonathyn C Zapf 65 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
65 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zapf vs. the course average
A
+9.2
B
−7.9
C
−3.2
D
−2.9
F
+4.7
Difference in percentage points.
1.5% withdrew · 1 of 66 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.15
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Martin Robert Eyestone 61 grades · 1 term 2.75GPA
61 letter grades
Compare with the course
Eyestone vs. the course average
A
−14.7
B
−6.4
C
+13.5
D
+8.7
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
10.3% withdrew · 7 of 68 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Patrick R Leland 29 grades · 1 term 2.47GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Leland vs. the course average
A
−35.1
B
+22.3
C
−0.9
D
+2.5
F
+11.2
Difference in percentage points.
6.5% withdrew · 2 of 31 enrolled.
Overall3.97 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.30
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.10
Matthew Robert Pike 4 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Matthew Wennemann 35 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.65
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.95
Questions4.85
Daniel Douglas Carr 44 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.25
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.25
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.40
Questions4.65
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.