Course record PHIL
PHIL 1500
Reading, Writing and Reasoning
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable11 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record
Alexander Evan Wolf-Root 20 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.76
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.55
Reflection4.83
Respect5.00
Creativity4.38
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.90
Questions4.87
Joseph Wilson 25 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.07
Synthesis3.98
Collaboration2.87
Connection3.42
Contribution3.63
Discussion3.25
Inclusivity3.36
Grading3.89
Reflection3.90
Respect4.61
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.07
Interaction3.75
Challenge4.05
Questions4.08
Shane Bodhi Melnitzer 27 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.20
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Derick Hughes 11 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Kathryn Elizabeth Brophy 12 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.35
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.45
Reflection4.55
Respect4.65
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Dawn Marie Jacob 23 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.55
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Spencer Jay Case 14 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.23
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.11
Reflection4.40
Respect4.35
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.49
Questions4.11
Julia Levin 24 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology3.88
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.14
Connection3.67
Contribution4.07
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.52
Reflection4.59
Respect4.30
Creativity4.01
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.79
Challenge3.91
Questions4.89
Kristin Marie Mickelson 3 reported responses 2.70Eval / 5
Overall2.70 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.30
Connection3.00
Contribution2.00
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.30
Grading2.30
Reflection3.30
Respect2.30
Creativity2.70
Feedback2.30
Interaction3.00
Challenge3.00
Questions3.70
Wyatt Monroe Mcdaniel 6 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.62
Reflection4.23
Respect5.00
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.95
Challenge5.00
Questions4.57
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.