Course record PHIL

PHIL 1010

Introduction to Western Philosophy: Ancient

University of Colorado Boulder

518 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 11

Thomas Anthony Bonn 137 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
60.6% A
24.8% B
6.6% C
1.5% D
6.6% F

137 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bonn vs. the course average
A +17.3
B −6.1
C −6.4
D −4.1
F −0.8

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 3 of 140 enrolled.

Wen Xu 120 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
43.3% A
37.5% B
10.8% C
5.0% D
3.3% F

120 letter grades

Compare with the course
Xu vs. the course average
A +0.1
B +6.6
C −2.1
D −0.6
F −4.0

Difference in percentage points.

4.0% withdrew · 5 of 125 enrolled.

Dawn Marie Jacob 62 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
41.9% A
35.5% B
11.3% C
6.5% D
4.8% F

62 letter grades

Compare with the course
Jacob vs. the course average
A −1.3
B +4.6
C −1.6
D +0.9
F −2.5

Difference in percentage points.

4.6% withdrew · 3 of 65 enrolled.

Stanley Matthew Stolte 85 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
45.9% A
30.6% B
11.8% C
2.4% D
9.4% F

85 letter grades

Compare with the course
Stolte vs. the course average
A +2.6
B −0.3
C −1.2
D −3.2
F +2.1

Difference in percentage points.

13.3% withdrew · 13 of 98 enrolled.

Patrick R Leland 54 grades · 1 term 2.29GPA
22.2% A
24.1% B
27.8% C
14.8% D
11.1% F

54 letter grades

Compare with the course
Leland vs. the course average
A −21.0
B −6.8
C +14.8
D +9.2
F +3.8

Difference in percentage points.

8.5% withdrew · 5 of 59 enrolled.

Martin Robert Eyestone 60 grades · 1 term 2.28GPA
20.0% A
33.3% B
21.7% C
11.7% D
13.3% F

60 letter grades

Compare with the course
Eyestone vs. the course average
A −23.2
B +2.4
C +8.7
D +6.1
F +6.0

Difference in percentage points.

9.1% withdrew · 6 of 66 enrolled.

Alan G Sumler 8 reported responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration1.80
Connection4.40
Contribution3.10
Discussion2.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.20
Reflection3.90
Respect4.00
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.20
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.10
Questions3.90
Matthew Wennemann 21 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.55
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.85
Reflection4.85
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Spencer Cardwell 18 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.15
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.73
Reflection4.78
Respect4.33
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.78
Questions4.86
John Joseph Porter 7 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.30
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.