Course record NRSC

NRSC 2150

Introduction to Neuroscience II: Systems

University of Colorado Boulder

267 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2023–2026
Flunk Score62/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 10

Lauren Elizabeth Chun 88 grades · 1 term 3.67GPA
76.1% A
20.5% B
3.4% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

88 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chun vs. the course average
A +2.0
B +0.6
C −1.8
D same
F −0.7

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 2 of 90 enrolled.

Elizabeth Ann Stubblefield 179 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
73.2% A
19.6% B
6.1% C
0.0% D
1.1% F

179 letter grades

Compare with the course
Stubblefield vs. the course average
A −1.0
B −0.3
C +0.9
D same
F +0.4

Difference in percentage points.

2.7% withdrew · 5 of 184 enrolled.

Anushri Kartik Narayan 119 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

119 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.54
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.70
Reflection4.81
Respect4.82
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.76
Questions4.83
Lydia Rader 25 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.75
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Kris Lauridsen 58 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.29
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.56
Reflection4.69
Respect4.78
Creativity4.04
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.55
Questions4.79
Jennifer Gove 43 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.65
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Jacqui Fallon 21 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.45
Reflection4.70
Respect4.75
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.35
Questions4.90
Jeremy Taylor 61 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

61 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.35
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.15
Creativity4.05
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.25
Questions4.30
Ashley Barrows 107 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

107 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.62
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.87
Reflection4.78
Respect4.88
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.78
Questions4.90
Jessica Westerman 49 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

49 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.82
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.86
Reflection4.68
Respect4.87
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.62
Questions4.83
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.