Course record NRSC
NRSC 2100
Introduction to Neuroscience
University of Colorado Boulder
553 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2022
Flunk Score35/100
Below average
Matthew Joseph Hartsock 65 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
65 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hartsock vs. the course average
A
+18.0
B
−7.0
C
−7.1
D
−0.4
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
4.4% withdrew · 3 of 68 enrolled.
Overall4.87 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.99
Contribution4.97
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.99
Reflection4.99
Respect4.86
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.99
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Michael V Baratta 259 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
259 letter grades
Compare with the course
Baratta vs. the course average
A
−0.3
B
+1.9
C
+1.0
D
−1.9
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
4.4% withdrew · 12 of 271 enrolled.
Overall4.17 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.55
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.65
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Serge Campeau 116 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA
116 letter grades
Compare with the course
Campeau vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
−0.9
C
−1.9
D
+2.1
F
+2.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 3 of 119 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.01
Connection4.84
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.86
Reflection4.69
Respect4.92
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.44
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.89
Questions4.92
Linda R Watkins 100 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
100 letter grades
Compare with the course
Watkins vs. the course average
A
−12.8
B
+2.6
C
+5.2
D
+3.5
F
+1.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 3 of 103 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.65
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Elizabeth Ronda Woodruff 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.70GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 13 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Chrysta Andrade 28 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.45
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Raeghan Lea Mueller 35 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.31
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.37
Collaboration3.45
Connection3.77
Contribution3.42
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.59
Grading4.54
Reflection4.23
Respect4.88
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.95
Interaction3.99
Challenge4.22
Questions4.92
Gabriel William Costanza-Chavez 46 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.51
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.57
Reflection4.90
Respect4.74
Creativity4.07
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.67
Questions4.97
Jhair Branco Torres 22 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.85
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.95
Reflection4.60
Respect4.45
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.35
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.25
Questions4.30
Elora Wolf Williams 13 reported responses 3.76Eval / 5
Overall3.76 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration2.85
Connection3.60
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.05
Reflection3.95
Respect4.50
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.65
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.95
Questions4.10
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.