Course record MUSC
MUSC 7822
Seminar in Musicology
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable11 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score69/100
Strong
Jay Keister 10 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.99
Contribution4.99
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.99
Reflection4.99
Respect4.99
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.98
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Benjamin Raphael Teitelbaum 5 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.99
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.93
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.99
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Jeremy L Smith 14 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.73
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading5.00
Reflection4.73
Respect5.00
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.36
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.73
Questions5.00
Rebecca Maloy 4 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Austin Chinagorom Okigbo 7 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.73
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.18
Connection5.00
Contribution4.54
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.73
Reflection4.79
Respect4.98
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.84
Interaction4.79
Challenge5.00
Questions3.60
Susan R Thomas 2 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Robert S Shay 12 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.01
Connection3.81
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.49
Reflection4.81
Respect4.99
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.99
Questions4.80
Carlo Caballero 7 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.36
Connection4.08
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.72
Reflection4.96
Respect5.00
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Saraswathi Shukla 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Michael Uy 5 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.