Course record MUSC
MUSC 6822
Advanced Studies in Musicology
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable10 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score65/100
Strong
Carlo Caballero 7 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.99
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.99
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.99
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Austin Chinagorom Okigbo 5 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Laurie Sampsel 3 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Benjamin Raphael Teitelbaum 3 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Rebecca Maloy 4 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Susan R Thomas 3 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.30
Reflection3.30
Respect4.70
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Robert S Shay 13 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.97
Collaboration3.84
Connection4.63
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.45
Grading3.82
Reflection4.99
Respect4.72
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.82
Questions4.99
Jay Keister 3 reported responses 3.61Eval / 5
Overall3.61 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.70
Reflection3.70
Respect3.70
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.70
Questions4.30
Michael Uy 6 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jeremy L Smith 11 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.