Course record MUEL
MUEL 3822
Words and Music
University of Colorado Boulder
220 grades5 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Charles Amos Wofford 43 grades · 1 term 3.79GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wofford vs. the course average
A
+27.1
B
−21.3
C
−4.9
D
−0.9
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 43 enrolled.
Overall4.10 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.20
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Rebecca Maloy 49 grades · 1 term 3.70GPA
49 letter grades
Compare with the course
Maloy vs. the course average
A
+13.9
B
−3.5
C
−7.3
D
−0.9
F
−2.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 49 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Carlo Caballero 79 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
79 letter grades
Compare with the course
Caballero vs. the course average
A
−7.9
B
+8.3
C
−0.9
D
+0.4
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 3 of 82 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.65
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.45
Reflection4.75
Respect4.95
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.69
Questions4.95
Benjamin Raphael Teitelbaum 49 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA
49 letter grades
Compare with the course
Teitelbaum vs. the course average
A
−24.9
B
+8.8
C
+13.1
D
+1.1
F
+1.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 1 of 50 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.32
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.11
Reflection4.61
Respect4.80
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.51
Questions4.51
Robert S Shay 16 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.