Course record MUEL
MUEL 3642
History of Jazz
University of Colorado Boulder
3,548 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record
Zach Howarth 164 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
164 letter grades
Compare with the course
Howarth vs. the course average
A
+15.4
B
−11.6
C
−4.1
D
−1.9
F
+2.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 4 of 168 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
229 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.69
Connection4.48
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.64
Reflection4.58
Respect4.84
Creativity4.52
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.26
Challenge4.62
Questions4.53
Andres Orco-Zerpa 330 grades · 1 term 3.56GPA
330 letter grades
Compare with the course
Orco-Zerpa vs. the course average
A
+5.2
B
−2.2
C
−1.1
D
−1.0
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 8 of 338 enrolled.
Overall4.27 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration3.54
Connection4.30
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.31
Reflection4.51
Respect4.71
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.54
Questions4.70
Matthew Nelson Smiley 235 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
235 letter grades
Compare with the course
Smiley vs. the course average
A
+3.1
B
−0.3
C
−1.4
D
−0.6
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 2 of 237 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration3.95
Connection4.65
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.85
Reflection4.71
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.65
Questions4.88
Heath Ryan Walton 2,275 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
2,275 letter grades
Compare with the course
Walton vs. the course average
A
same
B
+0.1
C
+0.2
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 25 of 2,300 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
424 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration3.67
Connection4.50
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.54
Reflection4.55
Respect4.81
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.55
Questions4.52
Seajun Kwon 259 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
259 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kwon vs. the course average
A
+1.6
B
−3.3
C
−1.2
D
+2.0
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 3 of 262 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
169 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.79
Connection4.42
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.51
Reflection4.57
Respect4.73
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.28
Challenge4.43
Questions4.50
Michael Phillip D'Angelo 103 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
103 letter grades
Compare with the course
D'Angelo vs. the course average
A
−19.0
B
+13.3
C
+2.9
D
+3.0
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 1 of 104 enrolled.
Brian William Woodbury 182 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
182 letter grades
Compare with the course
Woodbury vs. the course average
A
−19.2
B
+11.2
C
+5.4
D
−0.2
F
+2.9
Difference in percentage points.
4.2% withdrew · 8 of 190 enrolled.
Overall4.19 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.89
Connection4.05
Contribution3.52
Discussion4.12
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.49
Reflection4.42
Respect4.85
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.02
Interaction3.99
Challenge4.30
Questions4.72
Keith John Waters 40 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.58
Technology4.36
Synthesis3.79
Collaboration2.82
Connection3.95
Contribution4.17
Discussion2.96
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.10
Reflection4.55
Respect4.17
Creativity4.52
Feedback3.05
Interaction3.33
Challenge3.96
Questions4.52
John G Gunther 15 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.87
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.78
Reflection4.91
Respect4.97
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.96
Questions4.95
Matt Smiley 134 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
134 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.45
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.62
Reflection4.58
Respect4.78
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.58
Questions4.78
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.