Course record MUEL
MUEL 1832
Appreciation of Music
University of Colorado Boulder
7,486 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score60/100
Strong
Jay Keister 1,138 grades · 1 term 3.84GPA
1,138 letter grades
Compare with the course
Keister vs. the course average
A
+1.8
B
−0.3
C
−0.8
D
−0.4
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 18 of 1,156 enrolled.
Overall4.09 / 5
243 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.37
Connection4.25
Contribution3.53
Discussion3.98
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.47
Reflection4.27
Respect4.51
Creativity3.93
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.33
Questions4.45
Jeremy L Smith 5,626 grades · 1 term 3.80GPA
5,626 letter grades
Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A
+2.0
B
−1.4
C
−0.4
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.7% withdrew · 39 of 5,665 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
4,539 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration3.47
Connection4.34
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.69
Reflection4.61
Respect4.76
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.53
Questions4.80
Lydia Wagenknecht 144 grades · 1 term 3.60GPA
144 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wagenknecht vs. the course average
A
−13.7
B
+8.8
C
+4.0
D
+0.9
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 3 of 147 enrolled.
Overall4.36 / 5
87 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.90
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Brandon Jeffrey Stover 429 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
429 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stover vs. the course average
A
−12.7
B
+6.2
C
+4.5
D
+0.9
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 9 of 438 enrolled.
Overall4.36 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Jameson Foster 49 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
49 letter grades
Compare with the course
Foster vs. the course average
A
−43.0
B
+36.3
C
+5.9
D
−0.5
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 2 of 51 enrolled.
Overall4.54 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration2.63
Connection4.39
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.71
Reflection4.89
Respect4.24
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.68
Questions4.71
Karl Isaac Johnson 100 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
100 letter grades
Compare with the course
Johnson vs. the course average
A
−36.9
B
+25.4
C
+4.8
D
+3.5
F
+3.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 1 of 101 enrolled.
Maria Alexandra Siso 3 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.38
Contribution4.15
Discussion3.92
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.62
Reflection4.62
Respect4.38
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.38
Questions4.62
Yoshiyuki Ishikawa 4 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Leslee Smucker 16 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.32
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.85
Reflection4.61
Respect5.00
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.62
Questions4.85
Charles Amos Wofford 13 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.44
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.65
Grading3.59
Reflection4.65
Respect4.86
Creativity3.91
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.54
Questions4.11
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.