Course record MKTG
MKTG 3250
Buyer Behavior
University of Colorado Boulder
1,688 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record
Margaret T Head 846 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
846 letter grades
Compare with the course
Head vs. the course average
A
+5.4
B
−5.3
C
+0.7
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.7% withdrew · 6 of 852 enrolled.
Overall4.79 / 5
108 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.97
Contribution4.52
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.89
Reflection4.73
Respect4.98
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.84
Questions4.96
Jonathan James Gladstone 460 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
460 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gladstone vs. the course average
A
+6.7
B
−5.9
C
−1.4
D
+0.5
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 6 of 466 enrolled.
Overall4.62 / 5
356 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.91
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.70
Reflection4.85
Respect4.80
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.71
Questions4.84
Albert Peter Mcgraw Iv 278 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA
278 letter grades
Compare with the course
Iv vs. the course average
A
−18.0
B
+17.6
C
−1.7
D
+1.3
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 5 of 283 enrolled.
Elizabeth Seelye 72 grades · 1 term 2.98GPA
72 letter grades
Compare with the course
Seelye vs. the course average
A
−29.0
B
+27.5
C
+3.2
D
−1.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 72 enrolled.
Overall3.86 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.90
Questions3.60
Elmer Feliciano Ramos 32 grades · 1 term 2.94GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ramos vs. the course average
A
−18.6
B
+10.4
C
+9.8
D
−1.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 1 of 33 enrolled.
Overall4.49 / 5
98 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.88
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.37
Reflection4.83
Respect4.76
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.92
Questions4.81
Margaret Winter 44 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.95
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.85
Respect4.95
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Albert Peter Mcgraw 28 reported responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration3.65
Connection4.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.10
Reflection3.85
Respect3.60
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.10
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.15
Questions3.70
Meg Winter 201 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
201 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.74
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.89
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.84
Reflection4.68
Respect4.89
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.78
Questions4.90
Peter Mcgraw 104 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
104 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology3.75
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.34
Grading3.67
Reflection4.05
Respect4.32
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.35
Interaction4.14
Challenge4.06
Questions3.92
Jason Dana 35 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.77
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.40
Reflection4.47
Respect4.87
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.70
Questions4.77
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.