Course record MGMT
MGMT 3100
Operations Management
University of Colorado Boulder
584 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below average
Robert Dubois 59 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
59 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dubois vs. the course average
A
+39.5
B
−20.6
C
−16.5
D
−1.9
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 1 of 60 enrolled.
Sentao Miao 32 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Miao vs. the course average
A
+10.7
B
−0.6
C
−10.8
D
−1.9
F
+2.6
Difference in percentage points.
8.6% withdrew · 3 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.04 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.25
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.90
Contribution3.55
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity2.70
Grading4.65
Reflection3.80
Respect3.45
Creativity3.15
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Gurumurthi Ravishankar 156 grades · 1 term 3.10GPA
156 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ravishankar vs. the course average
A
+4.6
B
+3.7
C
−7.3
D
−1.2
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.6% withdrew · 1 of 157 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
102 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.19
Connection4.84
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.42
Reflection4.59
Respect4.62
Creativity4.21
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.67
Questions4.84
Lori Elizabeth Seward 132 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
132 letter grades
Compare with the course
Seward vs. the course average
A
−5.0
B
+3.4
C
+1.7
D
−0.4
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 3 of 135 enrolled.
Overall4.19 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.40
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.54
Reflection4.19
Respect4.53
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.38
Questions4.51
D Keith Denton 205 grades · 1 term 2.74GPA
205 letter grades
Compare with the course
Denton vs. the course average
A
−13.4
B
+1.0
C
+10.9
D
+2.0
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 5 of 210 enrolled.
Overall3.32 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.23
Technology2.41
Synthesis3.09
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.23
Contribution3.61
Discussion3.96
Inclusivity2.80
Grading2.67
Reflection3.17
Respect3.24
Creativity3.05
Feedback2.69
Interaction3.80
Challenge2.92
Questions3.18
Hanno Edgar Holm 21 reported responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.10
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.65
Reflection4.00
Respect4.40
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.95
Questions4.35
Yuchen Luo 29 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.80
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.35
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.