Course record MDST

MDST 4871

Special Topics

University of Colorado Boulder

91 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score64/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 10

Shaylynn Lynch Lesinski 38 grades · 1 term 3.66GPA
76.3% A
21.1% B
2.6% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

38 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lesinski vs. the course average
A +4.9
B −4.2
C +0.4
D same
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

2.6% withdrew · 1 of 39 enrolled.

Hunter Vaughan 38 grades · 1 term 3.53GPA
63.2% A
31.6% B
2.6% C
0.0% D
2.6% F

38 letter grades

Compare with the course
Vaughan vs. the course average
A −8.3
B +6.3
C +0.4
D same
F +1.5

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 38 enrolled.

Evan Rowe 15 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.76GPA
80.0% A
20.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

15 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 15 enrolled.

Arthur Bamford 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Colette Perold 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Hibah Ahmad 16 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration3.89
Connection4.06
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.52
Grading3.79
Reflection4.12
Respect4.45
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.17
Questions4.32
Deborha Ashley Tycoliz Campbell 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Ediz Ozelkan 7 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Ian James Alexander 2 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Naim M I Aburaddi 4 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.