Course record MDST
MDST 3002
Digital Culture and Politics
University of Colorado Boulder
483 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score64/100
Strong
Emma Joy Lawrence 180 grades · 1 term 3.74GPA
180 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lawrence vs. the course average
A
+12.5
B
−12.3
C
−0.5
D
−0.7
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.6% withdrew · 1 of 181 enrolled.
Overall4.88 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.87
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.92
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.89
Reflection4.90
Respect4.97
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.87
Questions4.93
Rory Bledsoe 90 grades · 1 term 3.67GPA
90 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bledsoe vs. the course average
A
−5.2
B
+11.0
C
−2.7
D
−1.2
F
−1.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 90 enrolled.
Overall4.70 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.83
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.83
Grading3.71
Reflection4.15
Respect4.57
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.00
Questions4.15
Kevan Feshami 81 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
81 letter grades
Compare with the course
Feshami vs. the course average
A
+2.4
B
−0.3
C
−2.7
D
+1.2
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 1 of 82 enrolled.
Overall4.81 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Sandra Ristovska 69 grades · 1 term 3.47GPA
69 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ristovska vs. the course average
A
−13.3
B
+13.3
C
+0.2
D
+0.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 69 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
104 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.84
Connection4.72
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.57
Reflection4.77
Respect4.64
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.64
Questions4.67
Nathan Todd Schneider 34 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
34 letter grades
Compare with the course
Schneider vs. the course average
A
−6.5
B
−8.3
C
+15.0
D
−1.2
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 2 of 36 enrolled.
Overall4.42 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.61
Grading3.81
Reflection4.70
Respect4.61
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.41
Questions4.41
Debora Correa De Castro E Martini 29 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
29 letter grades
Compare with the course
Martini vs. the course average
A
−29.3
B
+21.3
C
+0.8
D
+5.7
F
+1.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 1 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.79 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Anna Colleen Turner 5 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.91
Connection4.78
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.50
Reflection4.35
Respect4.13
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.35
Questions4.50
Matthew Dale Pickard 14 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration3.83
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.77
Reflection4.52
Respect4.44
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.67
Questions4.98
Iris Ghatak 20 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.45
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Susan Marie Abbott 8 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology2.32
Synthesis3.21
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.14
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.91
Grading2.39
Reflection4.07
Respect4.79
Creativity3.07
Feedback2.23
Interaction4.84
Challenge3.93
Questions2.32
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.