Course record MDST

MDST 1002

Introduction to Social Media

University of Colorado Boulder

2,021 grades18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 18

Shaylynn Lynch Lesinski 31 grades · 1 term 3.76GPA
83.9% A
12.9% B
3.2% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

31 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lesinski vs. the course average
A +25.8
B −17.3
C −5.1
D −1.2
F −2.1

Difference in percentage points.

6.1% withdrew · 2 of 33 enrolled.

Steven Earl Frost 244 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
67.2% A
28.7% B
4.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

244 letter grades

Compare with the course
Frost vs. the course average
A +9.2
B −1.5
C −4.3
D −1.2
F −2.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.6% withdrew · 4 of 248 enrolled.

Colette Perold 680 grades · 1 term 3.57GPA
70.6% A
22.5% B
5.0% C
1.0% D
0.9% F

680 letter grades

Compare with the course
Perold vs. the course average
A +12.5
B −7.7
C −3.4
D −0.2
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

1.9% withdrew · 13 of 693 enrolled.

John Richard Stevens 216 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
66.2% A
27.3% B
6.5% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

216 letter grades

Compare with the course
Stevens vs. the course average
A +8.2
B −2.9
C −1.9
D −1.2
F −2.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.9% withdrew · 2 of 218 enrolled.

Shannon Marie Sindorf 187 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
48.1% A
38.0% B
11.8% C
1.6% D
0.5% F

187 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sindorf vs. the course average
A −9.9
B +7.7
C +3.4
D +0.4
F −1.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 4 of 191 enrolled.

Nathan Todd Schneider 663 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
40.7% A
38.3% B
13.3% C
2.3% D
5.4% F

663 letter grades

Compare with the course
Schneider vs. the course average
A −17.3
B +8.1
C +4.9
D +1.0
F +3.3

Difference in percentage points.

3.5% withdrew · 24 of 687 enrolled.

Naim M I Aburaddi 31 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.97
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.94
Reflection4.90
Respect4.98
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.94
Questions4.96
Anne Cantwell 34 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.64
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.63
Reflection4.46
Respect4.63
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.34
Questions4.67
Rachel Ramlawi 31 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.15
Reflection4.30
Respect4.65
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.15
Questions4.45
Somi Soroush 50 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.46
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.49
Reflection4.37
Respect4.75
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.39
Questions4.59
Show all 18 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.