Course record MDST
MDST 1002
Introduction to Social Media
University of Colorado Boulder
2,021 grades18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed record
Shaylynn Lynch Lesinski 31 grades · 1 term 3.76GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lesinski vs. the course average
A
+25.8
B
−17.3
C
−5.1
D
−1.2
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
6.1% withdrew · 2 of 33 enrolled.
Overall4.47 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.94
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.96
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.63
Reflection4.77
Respect4.93
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.78
Questions4.51
Steven Earl Frost 244 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
244 letter grades
Compare with the course
Frost vs. the course average
A
+9.2
B
−1.5
C
−4.3
D
−1.2
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 4 of 248 enrolled.
Overall4.27 / 5
163 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.55
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.25
Questions4.30
Colette Perold 680 grades · 1 term 3.57GPA
680 letter grades
Compare with the course
Perold vs. the course average
A
+12.5
B
−7.7
C
−3.4
D
−0.2
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 13 of 693 enrolled.
Overall4.36 / 5
215 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.23
Connection4.74
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.61
Reflection4.75
Respect4.84
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.68
Questions4.46
John Richard Stevens 216 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
216 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stevens vs. the course average
A
+8.2
B
−2.9
C
−1.9
D
−1.2
F
−2.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.9% withdrew · 2 of 218 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.13
Connection5.00
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.96
Reflection4.99
Respect4.97
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.97
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.97
Questions4.96
Shannon Marie Sindorf 187 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
187 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sindorf vs. the course average
A
−9.9
B
+7.7
C
+3.4
D
+0.4
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 4 of 191 enrolled.
Nathan Todd Schneider 663 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
663 letter grades
Compare with the course
Schneider vs. the course average
A
−17.3
B
+8.1
C
+4.9
D
+1.0
F
+3.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 24 of 687 enrolled.
Overall3.90 / 5
214 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration3.84
Connection4.60
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.33
Reflection4.18
Respect4.61
Creativity4.59
Feedback3.84
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.27
Questions4.53
Naim M I Aburaddi 31 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.97
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.94
Grading4.94
Reflection4.90
Respect4.98
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.94
Questions4.96
Anne Cantwell 34 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.64
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.63
Reflection4.46
Respect4.63
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.34
Questions4.67
Rachel Ramlawi 31 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.15
Reflection4.30
Respect4.65
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.15
Questions4.45
Somi Soroush 50 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.46
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.49
Reflection4.37
Respect4.75
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.39
Questions4.59
Talia Aygun 13 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.62
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.19
Reflection4.43
Respect4.43
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.43
Questions4.58
Seonah Kim 72 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5
72 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.23
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration3.28
Connection4.53
Contribution3.28
Discussion3.82
Inclusivity4.18
Grading3.88
Reflection4.08
Respect4.45
Creativity3.94
Feedback3.48
Interaction3.82
Challenge4.08
Questions3.95
Hanna Mcelduff 19 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.31
Connection4.94
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.65
Reflection4.68
Respect4.94
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.80
Questions4.73
Rajatava Karmaker 19 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology4.08
Synthesis3.82
Collaboration3.88
Connection4.25
Contribution3.67
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.03
Reflection4.19
Respect4.56
Creativity3.92
Feedback3.59
Interaction4.26
Challenge3.95
Questions4.27
Sol Heo 34 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration4.12
Connection3.87
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.21
Reflection4.49
Respect4.62
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.58
Challenge3.88
Questions4.64
Matthew Dale Pickard 8 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Susan Marie Abbott 30 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.30
Connection4.50
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.00
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.90
Questions3.80
Shitong Li 6 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.75
Connection4.75
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.40
Reflection3.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.35
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.