Course record MCEN
MCEN 3047
Data Analysis and Experimental Methods
University of Colorado Boulder
1,151 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score22/100
Below average
Lauren A Cooper 58 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
58 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cooper vs. the course average
A
+18.6
B
−10.0
C
−9.0
D
−0.9
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 58 enrolled.
Overall4.51 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.75
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.14
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.47
Reflection4.33
Respect4.94
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.46
Questions4.43
Mary Elyssa Mcguinn 121 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
121 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mcguinn vs. the course average
A
+13.1
B
−4.3
C
−8.3
D
same
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 1 of 122 enrolled.
Overall3.80 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.80
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.80
Reflection3.70
Respect4.20
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.70
Questions3.80
Marina Eller Vance 335 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
335 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vance vs. the course average
A
−0.5
B
+1.8
C
−1.2
D
−0.6
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.3% withdrew · 1 of 336 enrolled.
Overall4.10 / 5
263 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.19
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.66
Grading3.76
Reflection3.99
Respect4.49
Creativity3.99
Feedback3.68
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.09
Questions4.27
Wei Tan 75 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
75 letter grades
Compare with the course
Tan vs. the course average
A
+3.8
B
−5.1
C
+1.2
D
+0.5
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 75 enrolled.
Overall3.55 / 5
288 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.79
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration4.17
Connection3.78
Contribution3.45
Discussion3.62
Inclusivity3.23
Grading3.57
Reflection3.56
Respect4.02
Creativity3.47
Feedback3.24
Interaction4.19
Challenge3.55
Questions3.82
Keith Thomas Regner 443 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
443 letter grades
Compare with the course
Regner vs. the course average
A
−3.0
B
+4.5
C
−1.3
D
same
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 443 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
112 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.70
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.62
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Peter Paul Mitrano 119 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
119 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mitrano vs. the course average
A
−12.2
B
−9.4
C
+20.3
D
+1.7
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 4 of 123 enrolled.
Overall3.85 / 5
98 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.29
Technology3.24
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.22
Contribution3.33
Discussion3.66
Inclusivity3.23
Grading2.68
Reflection3.22
Respect3.87
Creativity3.47
Feedback2.38
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.29
Questions2.76
Carmen Pacheco-Borden 62 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
62 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.06
Technology3.79
Synthesis3.79
Collaboration4.27
Connection3.83
Contribution3.79
Discussion3.91
Inclusivity3.13
Grading3.75
Reflection3.73
Respect4.35
Creativity3.75
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.94
Questions3.98
Cara Gonzalez Welker 238 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
238 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.21
Synthesis3.94
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.20
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity3.54
Grading4.07
Reflection3.98
Respect4.48
Creativity4.04
Feedback3.84
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.04
Questions4.16
Heather Johanna Swenson 15 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.00
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.60
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.