Course record MCEN
MCEN 3030
Computational Methods
University of Colorado Boulder
1,119 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below average
Robert Bruce Maccurdy 475 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
475 letter grades
Compare with the course
Maccurdy vs. the course average
A
+14.7
B
−8.0
C
−4.7
D
−1.7
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 12 of 487 enrolled.
Overall4.18 / 5
393 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.13
Collaboration3.42
Connection3.96
Contribution3.84
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.48
Grading4.23
Reflection4.29
Respect4.47
Creativity4.47
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.47
Questions4.36
Jeremy Koch 91 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
91 letter grades
Compare with the course
Koch vs. the course average
A
+3.7
B
+1.9
C
−5.8
D
−1.2
F
+1.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 92 enrolled.
Overall3.78 / 5
158 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.06
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.97
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.01
Contribution3.74
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.38
Grading3.35
Reflection3.93
Respect4.42
Creativity4.08
Feedback3.27
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.27
Questions3.97
Daven Ker Henze 98 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
98 letter grades
Compare with the course
Henze vs. the course average
A
−1.2
B
−6.7
C
+4.0
D
+1.8
F
+2.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.8% withdrew · 6 of 104 enrolled.
Keith Thomas Regner 308 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
308 letter grades
Compare with the course
Regner vs. the course average
A
−10.0
B
+6.0
C
+2.7
D
+0.9
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 14 of 322 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
128 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.66
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.43
Reflection4.54
Respect4.77
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.61
Questions4.65
Forest O Mannan 56 grades · 1 term 3.04GPA
56 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mannan vs. the course average
A
−15.5
B
+4.3
C
+10.2
D
+3.0
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 56 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.43
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.14
Reflection4.56
Respect4.79
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.92
Questions4.95
Francisco Castro 91 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
91 letter grades
Compare with the course
Castro vs. the course average
A
−35.8
B
+23.9
C
+10.7
D
+3.2
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 91 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
98 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.42
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.43
Reflection4.54
Respect4.80
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.73
Questions4.78
Peter Paul Mitrano 13 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.15
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.80
Reflection4.05
Respect4.65
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.05
Questions4.10
Jeffrey Steven Knutsen 12 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Peter Edward Hamlington 32 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.80
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Travis Hainsworth 19 reported responses 3.29Eval / 5
Overall3.29 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.90
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration3.90
Connection3.30
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.40
Reflection3.40
Respect4.20
Creativity3.30
Feedback2.60
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.20
Questions3.10
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.