Course record MCEN
MCEN 3025
Component Design
University of Colorado Boulder
1,293 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record
Derek T Reamon 842 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
842 letter grades
Compare with the course
Reamon vs. the course average
A
+7.9
B
−4.3
C
−2.9
D
−0.5
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 11 of 853 enrolled.
Overall4.42 / 5
318 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.77
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.87
Grading3.94
Reflection4.41
Respect4.61
Creativity4.48
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.42
Questions4.26
Jeffrey Steven Knutsen 269 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
269 letter grades
Compare with the course
Knutsen vs. the course average
A
−4.2
B
+3.4
C
+0.8
D
+0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 3 of 272 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
259 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.81
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.19
Reflection4.63
Respect4.69
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.76
Questions4.62
Greg A Vanderbeek 58 grades · 1 term 3.10GPA
58 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vanderbeek vs. the course average
A
−29.8
B
+28.6
C
+0.9
D
+0.7
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 58 enrolled.
Overall4.13 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.08
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.48
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.45
Inclusivity2.58
Grading2.48
Reflection3.79
Respect4.12
Creativity4.17
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.11
Questions3.28
Francisco Castro 124 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
124 letter grades
Compare with the course
Castro vs. the course average
A
−30.4
B
+8.2
C
+17.3
D
+3.0
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 2 of 126 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
125 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.77
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.54
Reflection4.58
Respect4.73
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.77
Questions4.78
Jenifer L Blacklock 3 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.70
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.70
Reflection3.70
Respect4.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.70
Questions3.70
Chip Gregory William Bollendonk 45 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.93
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.17
Reflection4.61
Respect4.52
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.78
Questions4.65
Kelsey Scalaro 165 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
165 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.70
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.29
Reflection4.47
Respect4.72
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.61
Questions4.60
Tony Thomas 6 reported responses 2.60Eval / 5
Overall2.60 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.70
Technology3.50
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration2.80
Connection3.20
Contribution2.50
Discussion2.30
Inclusivity2.00
Grading2.80
Reflection2.70
Respect2.40
Creativity2.50
Feedback2.20
Interaction3.30
Challenge2.30
Questions2.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.