Course record MCEN
MCEN 2063
Mechanics of Solids
University of Colorado Boulder
1,307 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score16/100
Needs work
Todd W Murray 584 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
584 letter grades
Compare with the course
Murray vs. the course average
A
+3.6
B
−3.1
C
+1.6
D
−2.3
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
5.0% withdrew · 31 of 615 enrolled.
Overall4.07 / 5
329 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.11
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration3.64
Connection4.34
Contribution3.76
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity3.14
Grading4.19
Reflection4.22
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.42
Questions4.36
Virginia Lea Ferguson 205 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
205 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ferguson vs. the course average
A
same
B
+3.3
C
−3.2
D
−2.1
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 6 of 211 enrolled.
Overall3.93 / 5
123 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration3.67
Connection4.41
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.01
Reflection4.17
Respect4.46
Creativity3.87
Feedback3.66
Interaction4.36
Challenge4.35
Questions4.30
Francois Barthelat 311 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
311 letter grades
Compare with the course
Barthelat vs. the course average
A
−0.8
B
+0.2
C
−2.1
D
+3.9
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 12 of 323 enrolled.
Overall3.97 / 5
106 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.38
Contribution3.68
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity3.18
Grading3.58
Reflection4.08
Respect4.44
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.29
Interaction4.03
Challenge4.32
Questions3.92
Rong Long 76 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
76 letter grades
Compare with the course
Long vs. the course average
A
−14.2
B
+14.4
C
+3.5
D
−2.2
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 76 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration3.34
Connection4.59
Contribution3.82
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.40
Reflection4.32
Respect4.62
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.31
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Jianliang Xiao 131 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
131 letter grades
Compare with the course
Xiao vs. the course average
A
−6.0
B
same
C
+1.0
D
+5.6
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
5.1% withdrew · 7 of 138 enrolled.
Overall4.01 / 5
173 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.58
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration3.88
Connection4.25
Contribution3.89
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.00
Reflection4.25
Respect4.57
Creativity4.39
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.47
Questions4.56
Ginger Ferguson 18 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Jorge Ramirez Lujan 35 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.10
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.70
Reflection4.10
Respect4.30
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions3.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.