Course record MCEN
MCEN 2023
Statics and Structures
University of Colorado Boulder
1,316 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score20/100
Below average
Maureen Ellen Lynch 350 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
350 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lynch vs. the course average
A
+6.2
B
−2.6
C
−3.4
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
4.6% withdrew · 17 of 367 enrolled.
Overall3.99 / 5
159 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.91
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.92
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.35
Contribution3.68
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.13
Grading3.56
Reflection3.98
Respect4.51
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.33
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.12
Questions4.01
Michael P. Hannigan 479 grades · 1 term 3.01GPA
479 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hannigan vs. the course average
A
+2.7
B
−2.4
C
−0.4
D
−0.6
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 11 of 490 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
245 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.14
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.74
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.86
Grading4.38
Reflection4.50
Respect4.69
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.58
Questions4.50
Nicholas Brian Bottenus 111 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
111 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bottenus vs. the course average
A
−12.1
B
+12.2
C
+0.7
D
+1.4
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 3 of 114 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.65
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.27
Reflection4.35
Respect4.88
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.63
Questions4.70
Corey P Neu 157 grades · 1 term 2.90GPA
157 letter grades
Compare with the course
Neu vs. the course average
A
−11.3
B
+5.5
C
+10.8
D
−3.1
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 3 of 160 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.60
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.60
Questions4.10
Jeffrey Steven Knutsen 103 grades · 1 term 2.88GPA
103 letter grades
Compare with the course
Knutsen vs. the course average
A
+1.4
B
−4.2
C
−1.7
D
+3.7
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
1.9% withdrew · 2 of 105 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Andrew P Baugher 116 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
116 letter grades
Compare with the course
Baugher vs. the course average
A
−4.5
B
+2.2
C
−1.9
D
+2.1
F
+2.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.7% withdrew · 7 of 123 enrolled.
Overall4.08 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.39
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.54
Contribution3.82
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.32
Reflection4.36
Respect4.58
Creativity4.11
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.44
Questions4.46
Katherine Ramos 161 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
161 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.89
Synthesis3.44
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.00
Contribution3.86
Discussion3.67
Inclusivity3.04
Grading3.86
Reflection4.01
Respect3.71
Creativity3.73
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.13
Questions3.92
Fatemeh Pourahmadian 19 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.80
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.70
Reflection3.70
Respect4.20
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.40
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.90
Questions3.70
Derek T Reamon 120 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
120 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.70
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity3.86
Grading4.28
Reflection4.38
Respect4.58
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.46
Questions4.53
Susan Reynolds 64 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
64 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.40
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.