Course record MCDB
MCDB 4650
Developmental Biology
University of Colorado Boulder
526 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Jennifer Kirsten Knight 36 grades · 1 term 3.53GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Knight vs. the course average
A
−2.0
B
+5.3
C
−1.7
D
−0.4
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.3% withdrew · 2 of 38 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
124 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.42
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.12
Grading3.89
Reflection4.42
Respect4.77
Creativity4.39
Feedback3.64
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.57
Questions4.55
Michael W Klymkowsky 246 grades · 1 term 3.48GPA
246 letter grades
Compare with the course
Klymkowsky vs. the course average
A
−3.4
B
+6.4
C
−2.4
D
−0.4
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 2 of 248 enrolled.
Overall4.11 / 5
88 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology3.65
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.14
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity3.64
Grading2.96
Reflection4.12
Respect4.31
Creativity4.17
Feedback2.73
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.27
Questions4.14
Justin J Brumbaugh 244 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
244 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brumbaugh vs. the course average
A
+3.7
B
−7.3
C
+2.6
D
+0.4
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
4.7% withdrew · 12 of 256 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
149 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.50
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.12
Grading4.58
Reflection4.69
Respect4.70
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.69
Zachary Sky Hazlett 26 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Ryan Sayegh 19 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Josh Fandel 24 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Mingfeng Liu 24 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.