Course record MCDB
MCDB 3145
Cell Biology
University of Colorado Boulder
1,167 grades6 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score7/100
Needs work
Gia Kaarina Voeltz 332 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
332 letter grades
Compare with the course
Voeltz vs. the course average
A
+8.8
B
+0.1
C
−8.0
D
+1.7
F
−2.7
Difference in percentage points.
4.9% withdrew · 17 of 349 enrolled.
Overall4.27 / 5
89 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.11
Synthesis3.82
Collaboration3.98
Connection4.40
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.19
Grading3.92
Reflection4.21
Respect4.80
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.41
Questions4.60
Soyeon Park 835 grades · 1 term 2.65GPA
835 letter grades
Compare with the course
Park vs. the course average
A
−3.5
B
−0.1
C
+3.2
D
−0.7
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.4% withdrew · 38 of 873 enrolled.
Overall3.95 / 5
450 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.99
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.79
Collaboration3.45
Connection4.19
Contribution3.43
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity3.44
Grading3.42
Reflection4.18
Respect4.24
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.72
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.10
Questions3.97
Lee Niswander 59 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
James D Orth 415 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
415 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.28
Synthesis3.74
Collaboration3.36
Connection4.14
Contribution3.42
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.43
Grading3.81
Reflection4.10
Respect4.35
Creativity3.63
Feedback3.08
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.31
Stella Nichol Koliavas 46 reported responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.30
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Chelsea Marie Toner 33 reported responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.50
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.90
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.70
Reflection3.70
Respect4.30
Creativity3.10
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.80
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.