Course record MCDB

MCDB 3135

Molecular Biology

University of Colorado Boulder

1,308 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 15

Nausica Christine Arnoult 598 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
56.7% A
28.3% B
12.4% C
1.0% D
1.7% F

598 letter grades

Compare with the course
Arnoult vs. the course average
A +12.4
B −3.8
C −4.8
D −2.4
F −1.3

Difference in percentage points.

4.0% withdrew · 25 of 623 enrolled.

Ravinder Singh 135 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
39.3% A
47.4% B
11.9% C
1.5% D
0.0% F

135 letter grades

Compare with the course
Singh vs. the course average
A −5.0
B +15.3
C −5.3
D −2.0
F −3.0

Difference in percentage points.

11.8% withdrew · 18 of 153 enrolled.

Joel M Kralj 575 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
32.5% A
32.5% B
23.5% C
6.4% D
5.0% F

575 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kralj vs. the course average
A −11.7
B +0.4
C +6.3
D +3.0
F +2.1

Difference in percentage points.

5.4% withdrew · 33 of 608 enrolled.

Olivia Marie Delletorri 31 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.10
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Zachary Sky Hazlett 28 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.10
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Mark Matyas 28 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.10
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Sebastian Carver 10 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.50
Connection3.60
Contribution2.20
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.20
Reflection3.60
Respect4.70
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.30
Interaction2.70
Challenge4.00
Questions3.90
Andreas Hoenger 395 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

395 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration3.52
Connection4.37
Contribution3.66
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity3.89
Grading4.49
Reflection4.30
Respect4.72
Creativity3.78
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.06
Questions4.64
Kerrie Elizabeth Macmillan 77 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5

77 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.00
Contribution2.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.30
Reflection3.80
Respect4.50
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Michaela Mccright 39 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.60
Contribution3.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.40
Reflection3.90
Respect4.60
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Show all 15 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.