Course record MCDB
MCDB 2171
Chemotherapeutic Discovery Through Hands-On Screens 2
University of Colorado Boulder
261 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score66/100
Strong
Pamela Ann Harvey 174 grades · 1 term 3.68GPA
174 letter grades
Compare with the course
Harvey vs. the course average
A
+13.8
B
−8.4
C
−5.0
D
−0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 4 of 178 enrolled.
Overall4.80 / 5
136 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.98
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.75
Reflection4.85
Respect4.90
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.82
Questions4.80
Maureen Ann Bjerke 87 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
87 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bjerke vs. the course average
A
−27.6
B
+16.9
C
+10.0
D
+0.8
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 3 of 90 enrolled.
Mitchell Leih 7 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Yifan Liu 6 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Makena M Schutz 5 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Tanner Alan Peltier 6 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.20
Delwin Maben G Maben 12 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.85
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.60
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity4.75
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Kiana Marie Roberts 12 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Cheryl Ann Pinzone 61 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.82
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.47
Reflection4.62
Respect4.80
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.60
Questions4.75
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.