Course record MCDB
MCDB 1161
From Dirt to DNA: Phage Genomics Laboratory I
University of Colorado Boulder
1,293 grades36 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed recordNancy Ann Guild 1,293 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
1,293 letter grades
3.3% withdrew · 44 of 1,337 enrolled.
Overall4.47 / 5
1,043 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.73
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.44
Reflection4.53
Respect4.67
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.49
Questions4.55
Christy Lynn Fillman 712 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
712 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.58
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.32
Reflection4.38
Respect4.59
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.41
Questions4.53
Ariel Lucas Eraso 29 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.27
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.32
Reflection4.58
Respect4.92
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.72
Questions4.88
Levi Simon 50 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.46
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.55
Reflection4.52
Respect4.83
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.55
Questions4.89
Sabrina Hafeez 29 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.17
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.88
Reflection4.70
Respect4.92
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.90
Paul Gendler 27 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.48
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.81
Grading4.37
Reflection4.58
Respect4.80
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.72
Questions4.82
Mika Nevo 27 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.68
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.65
Reflection4.74
Respect4.98
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.98
Tess Kathleen Mckinney 24 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.45
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.99
Grading4.71
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.57
Questions4.78
Megan Lea Greening 138 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
138 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.76
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.51
Reflection4.68
Respect4.78
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.66
Questions4.80
Daria Nicke 14 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.