Course record MCDB

MCDB 1161

From Dirt to DNA: Phage Genomics Laboratory I

University of Colorado Boulder

1,293 grades36 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 36

Nancy Ann Guild 1,293 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
61.9% A
25.4% B
7.2% C
1.9% D
3.6% F

1,293 letter grades

3.3% withdrew · 44 of 1,337 enrolled.

Christy Lynn Fillman 712 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

712 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.58
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.32
Reflection4.38
Respect4.59
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.41
Questions4.53
Ariel Lucas Eraso 29 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.27
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.32
Reflection4.58
Respect4.92
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.72
Questions4.88
Levi Simon 50 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.46
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.55
Reflection4.52
Respect4.83
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.55
Questions4.89
Sabrina Hafeez 29 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.17
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.88
Reflection4.70
Respect4.92
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.90
Paul Gendler 27 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.48
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.81
Grading4.37
Reflection4.58
Respect4.80
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.72
Questions4.82
Mika Nevo 27 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.68
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.65
Reflection4.74
Respect4.98
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.98
Tess Kathleen Mckinney 24 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.45
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.99
Grading4.71
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.57
Questions4.78
Megan Lea Greening 138 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

138 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.76
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.51
Reflection4.68
Respect4.78
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.66
Questions4.80
Daria Nicke 14 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.90
Show all 36 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.