Course record MCDB
MCDB 1161
From Dirt to DNA: Phage Genomics Laboratory I
University of Colorado Boulder
1,293 grades36 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record
Nancy Ann Guild 1,293 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
1,293 letter grades
3.3% withdrew · 44 of 1,337 enrolled.
Overall4.47 / 5
1,043 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.41
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.73
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.44
Reflection4.53
Respect4.67
Creativity4.29
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.49
Questions4.55
Christy Lynn Fillman 712 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
712 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.14
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.58
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.32
Reflection4.38
Respect4.59
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.41
Questions4.53
Ariel Lucas Eraso 29 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.27
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.32
Reflection4.58
Respect4.92
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.72
Questions4.88
Levi Simon 50 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.46
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.55
Reflection4.52
Respect4.83
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.55
Questions4.89
Sabrina Hafeez 29 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.17
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.88
Reflection4.70
Respect4.92
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.90
Paul Gendler 27 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.48
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.81
Grading4.37
Reflection4.58
Respect4.80
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.72
Questions4.82
Mika Nevo 27 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.68
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.65
Reflection4.74
Respect4.98
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.98
Tess Kathleen Mckinney 24 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.45
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.99
Grading4.71
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.57
Questions4.78
Megan Lea Greening 138 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
138 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.76
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.51
Reflection4.68
Respect4.78
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.66
Questions4.80
Daria Nicke 14 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.90
Ashley Azadeh 33 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.32
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.75
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.57
Questions4.92
Brooke Shepard 37 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.30
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.37
Reflection4.53
Respect4.57
Creativity4.02
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.65
Rachel Leigh Martindale 13 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Naiara Doherty Garcia 35 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.40
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.57
Grading4.47
Reflection4.68
Respect4.67
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.88
Questions4.98
Fernando Hermoso Hern Munoz 14 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Rachel Gessner 29 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.48
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity3.42
Grading4.71
Reflection4.68
Respect4.98
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.82
Questions4.98
Sylas Anderson 42 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.29
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.42
Reflection4.52
Respect4.69
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.69
Questions4.77
Kaiden Lee 33 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.29
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity3.05
Grading4.57
Reflection4.57
Respect4.69
Creativity3.96
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.57
Questions4.75
Eva Kareus 22 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Colin Sempeck 41 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.22
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.53
Reflection4.43
Respect4.60
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.48
Questions4.81
Alex Fiorenza 33 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.36
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.52
Reflection4.45
Respect4.85
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.61
Questions4.82
Timothy Hutama 63 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.52
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity3.98
Grading4.84
Reflection4.64
Respect4.80
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.76
Questions4.86
Malia Fredrickson 28 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.57
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.65
Reflection4.59
Respect4.82
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.76
Questions4.90
Brittany Wu 37 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.63
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.28
Grading4.76
Reflection4.71
Respect4.88
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.83
Questions4.85
Emmalee Fischer 23 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Eitan Kochavi 19 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Dennis Boateng 19 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Karen Riley 439 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
439 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.62
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.47
Reflection4.49
Respect4.64
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.55
Questions4.71
Isabel Bravo 30 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.55
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.48
Grading4.48
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.61
Questions4.85
Evan Wood 42 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.48
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.78
Reflection4.58
Respect4.72
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.62
Questions4.85
Marie Ciminski 41 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.68
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.65
Reflection4.55
Respect4.78
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.88
Naomi Cook 33 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.45
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.72
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Gabriella Giese 46 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.63
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.68
Grading4.75
Reflection4.73
Respect4.95
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.81
Questions4.98
Annie Earthman 19 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Marcus Richards 38 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.57
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.72
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Madison Walsh 209 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
209 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.55
Reflection4.50
Respect4.65
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.48
Questions4.65
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.