Course record MCDB
MCDB 1150
Introduction to Cellular and Molecular Biology
University of Colorado Boulder
2,532 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score11/100
Needs work
Jessica A Gorski 125 grades · 1 term 3.14GPA
125 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gorski vs. the course average
A
+4.9
B
+15.6
C
−11.3
D
−5.0
F
−4.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 1 of 126 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
105 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.76
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.67
Reflection4.78
Respect4.96
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.81
Questions4.82
Melanie Peffer 185 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
185 letter grades
Compare with the course
Peffer vs. the course average
A
+9.9
B
−0.2
C
−3.0
D
−4.7
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 5 of 190 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
209 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.44
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.34
Inclusivity3.93
Grading4.28
Reflection4.41
Respect4.55
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.52
Questions4.38
Maureen Ann Bjerke 61 grades · 1 term 2.90GPA
61 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bjerke vs. the course average
A
+1.6
B
+2.9
C
+0.6
D
−2.5
F
−2.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 2 of 63 enrolled.
Overall4.71 / 5
185 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.54
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.67
Reflection4.81
Respect4.85
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.79
Questions4.78
Karen Riley 100 grades · 1 term 2.84GPA
100 letter grades
Compare with the course
Riley vs. the course average
A
−1.5
B
+11.4
C
−9.9
D
−0.8
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
6.5% withdrew · 7 of 107 enrolled.
Overall4.02 / 5
662 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.39
Synthesis3.89
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.18
Contribution3.84
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.34
Grading3.87
Reflection4.28
Respect4.49
Creativity3.82
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.21
Questions4.42
Nancy Ann Guild 1,775 grades · 1 term 2.71GPA
1,775 letter grades
Compare with the course
Guild vs. the course average
A
−0.8
B
−1.1
C
+0.3
D
+0.9
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
6.8% withdrew · 130 of 1,905 enrolled.
Overall3.89 / 5
646 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.89
Synthesis3.73
Collaboration3.78
Connection3.95
Contribution3.62
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity2.96
Grading3.71
Reflection3.92
Respect4.31
Creativity3.69
Feedback2.90
Interaction4.16
Challenge4.06
Questions4.14
Jennifer Mary Martin 286 grades · 1 term 2.65GPA
286 letter grades
Compare with the course
Martin vs. the course average
A
−3.7
B
−4.6
C
+8.1
D
+0.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
6.8% withdrew · 21 of 307 enrolled.
Overall3.90 / 5
640 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.71
Collaboration3.78
Connection3.95
Contribution3.62
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity2.96
Grading3.68
Reflection3.92
Respect4.21
Creativity3.61
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.18
Challenge4.02
Questions4.09
Megan Lea Greening 1 reported responses 2.57Eval / 5
Overall2.57 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection2.00
Contribution3.00
Reflection2.00
Interaction3.00
Christy Lynn Fillman 134 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
134 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.63
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.33
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.57
Grading3.77
Reflection4.30
Respect4.63
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.27
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.07
Questions4.50
Jennifer Kirsten Knight 339 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
339 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.25
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity3.35
Grading3.95
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.35
Questions4.45
Madison Walsh 77 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.10
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.