Course record MBAC
MBAC 6003
Foundations of Leadership
University of Colorado Boulder
395 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score30/100
Below averageAaron Roof 100 grades · 1 term 3.86GPA
100 letter grades
Compare with the course
Roof vs. the course average
A
+39.3
B
−39.8
C
−0.3
D
same
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 100 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.75
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.55
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Kimberly Campbell 58 grades · 1 term 3.83GPA
58 letter grades
Compare with the course
Campbell vs. the course average
A
+33.5
B
−31.0
C
−2.3
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 58 enrolled.
Overall2.89 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.40
Technology2.10
Synthesis2.40
Collaboration3.20
Connection2.70
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.10
Inclusivity3.50
Grading2.80
Reflection2.70
Respect3.50
Creativity2.10
Feedback3.10
Interaction3.70
Challenge2.20
Questions3.20
Douglas P Bennett 175 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
175 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bennett vs. the course average
A
−27.5
B
+30.0
C
−2.3
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.6% withdrew · 1 of 176 enrolled.
Overall3.87 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.83
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.27
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.03
Grading3.10
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.67
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.13
Questions4.30
Russell Salvador Cropanzano 62 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
62 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cropanzano vs. the course average
A
−17.2
B
+8.4
C
+9.0
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 62 enrolled.
Overall3.35 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.24
Technology3.07
Synthesis3.01
Collaboration3.34
Connection3.37
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity3.51
Grading2.58
Reflection3.30
Respect4.10
Creativity2.80
Feedback2.78
Interaction4.12
Challenge3.08
Questions3.94
Lisa Chapello 60 reported responses 3.76Eval / 5
Overall3.76 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.32
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration4.43
Connection3.94
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.91
Grading4.05
Reflection3.86
Respect4.53
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.04
Interaction4.45
Challenge3.72
Questions4.23
Julie Scher Smith 46 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.39
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.92
Reflection4.39
Respect4.80
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.17
Questions4.57
Ellie Gates 119 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
119 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology3.63
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity4.07
Grading3.73
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity3.83
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.43
Challenge3.97
Questions4.10
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.