Course record MBAC
MBAC 6001
Foundations of Teamwork
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable8 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below averageChristina Noelle Lacerenza 99 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
99 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.48
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.78
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.46
Reflection4.81
Respect4.79
Creativity4.83
Feedback3.66
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.69
Questions4.79
Antonio Papuzza 49 reported responses 2.92Eval / 5
Overall2.92 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology2.45
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.85
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.15
Inclusivity3.35
Grading1.65
Reflection3.90
Respect3.40
Creativity2.50
Feedback2.00
Interaction4.15
Challenge2.80
Questions3.55
David Anthony Lacek 25 reported responses 3.33Eval / 5
Overall3.33 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology3.40
Synthesis2.90
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.20
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.35
Reflection3.25
Respect3.70
Creativity2.30
Feedback3.05
Interaction4.40
Challenge2.80
Questions3.55
Russell Salvador Cropanzano 42 reported responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.99
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.59
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.00
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.92
Grading2.46
Reflection4.05
Respect4.12
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.48
Interaction4.58
Challenge3.69
Questions4.30
Lisa Chapello 20 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.79
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.23
Grading3.90
Reflection4.37
Respect4.26
Creativity4.03
Feedback3.48
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.20
Questions4.38
Kirsten Porter 28 reported responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading2.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.10
Creativity3.80
Feedback2.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions3.70
Matthew Higgins 11 reported responses 3.46Eval / 5
Overall3.46 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology2.70
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.70
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading2.80
Reflection3.50
Respect4.70
Creativity3.20
Feedback2.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.50
Questions3.30
James Richard Stevens Jr 38 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.45
Reflection4.15
Respect4.10
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.45
Challenge3.60
Questions4.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.