Course record MATH
MATH 5510
Introduction to Probability Theory
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable10 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average
Kyle Luh 8 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.61
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.23
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.00
Contribution3.62
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity1.00
Grading3.46
Reflection4.00
Respect4.23
Creativity3.46
Feedback2.69
Interaction3.85
Challenge4.00
Questions4.61
Yining Zhang 3 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.35
Technology3.46
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.65
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading2.35
Reflection4.88
Respect4.88
Creativity4.88
Feedback3.12
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.77
Questions4.12
Rodrigo Ribeiro 3 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.13
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Michael D Roy 1 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection5.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sergei Eugenievitch Kuznetsov 3 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology2.00
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration2.58
Connection4.74
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.50
Reflection3.37
Respect4.94
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.56
Interaction1.92
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jeffrey S Fox 2 reported responses 2.05Eval / 5
Overall2.05 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.00
Technology1.00
Synthesis1.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection1.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.00
Grading1.00
Reflection1.00
Respect4.50
Creativity2.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction3.00
Challenge2.00
Questions1.50
Nhan Du Vi Nguyen 1 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Eric Stade 1 reported responses 3.40Eval / 5
Overall3.40 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis1.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution2.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity1.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.00
Challenge3.00
Questions5.00
Joseph Benjamin Timmer 3 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.23
Synthesis3.46
Collaboration3.23
Connection5.00
Contribution3.46
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.23
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.46
Feedback3.35
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.23
Questions5.00
David R Grant 2 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology2.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.