Course record MATH
MATH 4650
Intermediate Numerical Analysis 1
University of Colorado Boulder
160 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed record
Divya E. Vernerey 59 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
59 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vernerey vs. the course average
A
−1.4
B
+3.6
C
same
D
−1.9
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 4 of 63 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.88
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.30
Reflection4.91
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.75
Questions4.12
David Lee Bosley 71 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
71 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bosley vs. the course average
A
−4.9
B
−1.5
C
+2.2
D
+2.4
F
+1.9
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 3 of 74 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration3.71
Connection4.30
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.78
Reflection4.34
Respect4.99
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.71
Questions4.80
Jeffrey S Fox 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
14 letter grades · Limited sample
6.7% withdrew · 1 of 15 enrolled.
Alexandru Nita 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.33GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
15.8% withdrew · 3 of 19 enrolled.
Stephen R Becker 6 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.15
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.15
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.75
Challenge4.15
Questions4.50
Alexander Nita 2 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.00
Connection1.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection3.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.00
Jan Adam Norris Ii 5 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology3.18
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.77
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.70
Grading1.76
Reflection4.88
Respect4.88
Creativity4.18
Feedback2.58
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.95
Questions2.65
Jacob Christian Spainhour 4 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Eduardo Corona 2 reported responses 2.10Eval / 5
Overall2.10 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.50
Technology1.50
Synthesis1.50
Collaboration3.00
Connection1.50
Contribution1.00
Discussion1.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading1.50
Reflection2.00
Respect4.00
Creativity2.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction3.50
Challenge1.50
Questions1.50
Adrianna Marie Gillman 4 reported responses 3.23Eval / 5
Overall3.23 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology2.80
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity2.80
Grading3.30
Reflection2.80
Respect3.00
Creativity3.80
Feedback2.80
Interaction2.80
Challenge4.00
Questions3.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.