Course record MATH
MATH 3850
Seminar in Guided Mathematics Instruction
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable10 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score82/100
Excellent
Kevin W Manley 9 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Robert Tubbs 6 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.77
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.38
Reflection4.38
Respect4.84
Creativity4.77
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.62
Joseph Benjamin Timmer 11 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.97
Grading5.00
Reflection4.99
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.99
Challenge5.00
Questions4.96
Lee Forrest Roberson 28 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.41
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.99
Reflection4.97
Respect4.69
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.69
Questions4.80
Harrison Edward Stalvey 9 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.98
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.85
Grading5.00
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.99
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Elizabeth Lee Grulke 7 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.07
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.23
Reflection4.53
Respect5.00
Creativity3.35
Feedback4.65
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.57
Questions4.97
Andrew Meier 3 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Rebekah Yuki Jones 4 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.00
Reflection4.88
Respect5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.54
Questions4.54
Justin Barhite 8 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.13
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity1.46
Grading5.00
Reflection4.57
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.78
Challenge5.00
Questions4.62
Jack Dalton 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.