Course record LING
LING 7800
Open Topics in Linguistics
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable8 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Laura A Michaelis-Cummings 12 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.12
Technology4.28
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration3.69
Connection4.84
Contribution3.69
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity4.82
Grading3.42
Reflection4.14
Respect4.86
Creativity4.41
Feedback3.92
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.27
Questions4.57
Katharina Lisa Maria Kann 6 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.00
Reflection3.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Martha Palmer 6 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.70
Reflection3.80
Respect4.50
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.20
Questions3.50
Alexis Palmer 21 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.59
Contribution4.94
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.96
Reflection4.59
Respect5.00
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Joseph Dupris 13 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration3.89
Connection4.95
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.65
Grading3.23
Reflection4.57
Respect4.54
Creativity4.62
Feedback2.69
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.72
Questions4.47
Hannah Haynie 3 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Ambrocio Gutierrez Lorenzo 8 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.10
Connection5.00
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback2.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.40
Kira Hall 13 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.95
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.73
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.24
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions4.65
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.