Course record LING
LING 6200
Issues and Methods in Cognitive Science
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable7 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score20/100
Below average
Ronald Mckell Carston 4 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
James H Martin 11 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.58
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.26
Reflection3.46
Respect4.64
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.24
Challenge4.54
Questions4.49
Jason Ian Zietz 5 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.40
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Marta Ceko 2 reported responses 3.47Eval / 5
Overall3.47 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading2.50
Reflection3.00
Respect4.50
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.50
Questions4.00
Roland Benoit 10 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.48
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration4.52
Connection3.83
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity3.61
Grading3.79
Reflection4.21
Respect4.79
Creativity3.82
Feedback3.04
Interaction4.52
Challenge3.29
Questions4.98
Theodora Chaspari 11 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.36
Technology4.05
Synthesis3.21
Collaboration4.13
Connection2.45
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.66
Grading2.45
Reflection1.79
Respect5.00
Creativity1.62
Feedback1.63
Interaction4.88
Challenge3.15
Questions4.95
Rosemary Cowell 1 reported responses 2.60Eval / 5
Overall2.60 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology1.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection2.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading2.00
Reflection1.00
Respect2.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge1.00
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.