Course record LING
LING 4560
Language Development
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score32/100
Below average
Amanda Michelle Brignola 2 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction4.00
Questions5.00
Jack S Damico 10 reported responses 3.56Eval / 5
Overall3.56 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.44
Technology3.55
Synthesis3.01
Collaboration2.35
Connection4.37
Contribution3.05
Discussion2.98
Inclusivity3.29
Grading3.59
Reflection3.63
Respect4.12
Creativity3.34
Feedback2.69
Interaction3.52
Challenge3.63
Questions3.12
Heather Lyn Hurlbut 10 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.34
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.69
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.58
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.49
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.53
Questions4.30
Karen Lynch 8 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration3.23
Connection5.00
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.66
Reflection4.87
Respect4.99
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.87
Questions4.95
Christina Nicole Meyers 15 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.75
Technology4.59
Synthesis2.74
Collaboration3.85
Connection3.49
Contribution3.86
Discussion3.88
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.85
Reflection3.85
Respect4.99
Creativity3.47
Feedback3.85
Interaction3.87
Challenge3.49
Questions4.63
Vincent Emile Salazar 1 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection4.00
Interaction5.00
Stephanie L Navarrete 4 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Ashley Duran-Sandoval 5 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology3.85
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.08
Connection4.35
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.65
Grading3.69
Reflection3.88
Respect4.88
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.35
Questions4.77
Tyler Reed Carson 2 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.