Course record LING
LING 4420
Morphology and Syntax
University of Colorado Boulder
147 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score29/100
Below average
Aous A Mansouri 25 grades · 1 term 3.67GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mansouri vs. the course average
A
+29.1
B
−17.3
C
−6.3
D
−2.0
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 1 of 26 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Hannah Haynie 62 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
62 letter grades
Compare with the course
Haynie vs. the course average
A
+3.1
B
−2.7
C
+0.2
D
−0.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.1% withdrew · 2 of 64 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.20
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Kristine Sue Stenzel 32 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stenzel vs. the course average
A
−6.3
B
+7.3
C
−1.8
D
+1.1
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 1 of 33 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
James Andrew Cowell 28 grades · 1 term 2.68GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cowell vs. the course average
A
−25.5
B
+13.1
C
+7.1
D
+1.5
F
+3.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 28 enrolled.
Overall4.14 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration2.60
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.50
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.60
Questions4.30
Jared W. Desjardins 1 reported responses 3.22Eval / 5
Overall3.22 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.00
Challenge3.00
Questions4.00
Daniel Witness Chen 4 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.20
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions3.70
Ambrocio Gutierrez Lorenzo 34 reported responses 3.32Eval / 5
Overall3.32 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology3.13
Synthesis3.07
Collaboration3.50
Connection2.98
Contribution3.78
Discussion3.82
Inclusivity3.98
Grading2.75
Reflection3.22
Respect4.43
Creativity2.92
Feedback2.35
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.52
Questions3.75
Zoe Dekruif 16 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.