Course record LING
LING 3430
Semantics
University of Colorado Boulder
192 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score42/100
Mixed record
Zygmunt Frajzyngier 28 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Frajzyngier vs. the course average
A
+13.5
B
−10.1
C
−2.8
D
−2.6
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
6.7% withdrew · 2 of 30 enrolled.
Overall3.70 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.80
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.20
Grading2.60
Reflection3.60
Respect4.60
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.20
Questions3.90
Bhuvaneswari Narasimhan 88 grades · 1 term 3.33GPA
88 letter grades
Compare with the course
Narasimhan vs. the course average
A
−0.1
B
+3.0
C
−3.3
D
+0.8
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 88 enrolled.
Overall4.63 / 5
109 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.41
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.54
Reflection4.61
Respect4.97
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.74
Questions4.84
Orin Hargraves 56 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
56 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hargraves vs. the course average
A
−13.2
B
+4.2
C
+9.7
D
−0.8
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 2 of 58 enrolled.
Overall4.10 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.97
Technology3.77
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.67
Connection4.03
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity3.37
Grading3.35
Reflection3.88
Respect3.98
Creativity3.86
Feedback3.66
Interaction3.78
Challenge3.79
Questions4.16
Mona Farrag Attwa 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.56GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 20 enrolled.
Overall4.43 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Min-Chun Hsiao 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kanupriya Kale 4 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.62
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.62
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.62
Questions4.62
Patrick Das 4 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.