Course record LING
LING 3100
Language Sound Structures
University of Colorado Boulder
541 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score26/100
Below average
Rebecca Anne Scarborough 131 grades · 1 term 3.23GPA
131 letter grades
Compare with the course
Scarborough vs. the course average
A
+7.4
B
−5.5
C
−3.6
D
+2.6
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 1 of 132 enrolled.
Overall4.42 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.60
Questions4.60
Jeremy Calder 130 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
130 letter grades
Compare with the course
Calder vs. the course average
A
+3.2
B
+2.3
C
−2.8
D
−2.0
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 1 of 131 enrolled.
Overall4.18 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration2.73
Connection3.82
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.22
Grading4.01
Reflection4.11
Respect4.51
Creativity3.62
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.21
Questions4.50
Andrew Ting 55 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
55 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ting vs. the course average
A
+4.1
B
−5.6
C
+2.6
D
−1.7
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 55 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
87 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.47
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.69
Reflection4.78
Respect4.90
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.79
Questions4.82
Elizabeth Goodrich 77 grades · 1 term 3.05GPA
77 letter grades
Compare with the course
Goodrich vs. the course average
A
−9.1
B
+4.6
C
+9.9
D
−2.2
F
−3.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.9% withdrew · 4 of 81 enrolled.
Overall4.17 / 5
110 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.16
Collaboration2.25
Connection3.95
Contribution3.72
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.63
Reflection4.43
Respect4.53
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.68
Questions4.68
Evan Hugh Coles-Harris 85 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
85 letter grades
Compare with the course
Coles-Harris vs. the course average
A
−5.6
B
+4.9
C
−3.3
D
+1.2
F
+2.7
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 5 of 90 enrolled.
Overall3.88 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.48
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.82
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.92
Inclusivity4.02
Grading3.81
Reflection4.01
Respect4.13
Creativity3.73
Feedback3.88
Interaction3.72
Challenge4.09
Questions4.21
Anna Clark 63 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
63 letter grades
Compare with the course
Clark vs. the course average
A
−7.1
B
−0.6
C
+3.3
D
+1.2
F
+3.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.6% withdrew · 1 of 64 enrolled.
Overall3.81 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.60
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.20
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.10
Questions4.20
Alyssa Strickler 25 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.78
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.82
Reflection4.84
Respect4.89
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.87
Questions4.86
Jonnia Carolan 23 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions4.90
Natalie Marie Grothues 25 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.45
Contribution3.65
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.10
Reflection4.15
Respect4.15
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.50
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.95
Questions4.15
Meredith Leigh Church 9 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.15
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.35
Questions4.85
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.