Course record LING
LING 2400
Language, Gender and Sexuality
University of Colorado Boulder
177 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score52/100
Mixed recordJeremy Calder 86 grades · 1 term 3.62GPA
86 letter grades
Compare with the course
Calder vs. the course average
A
+10.7
B
−11.6
C
+0.8
D
+1.2
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 87 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Kira Hall 91 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
91 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hall vs. the course average
A
−10.1
B
+10.9
C
−0.7
D
−1.1
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 92 enrolled.
Overall4.50 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.31
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.21
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.41
Mary Maureen Kosse 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Rebecca Kogan Lee 12 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.75
Reflection4.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.55
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Ayden Marzelle Parish 8 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration3.62
Connection4.81
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.81
Respect5.00
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.81
Questions4.96
Velda Khoo 26 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.75
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.95
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.85
Maureen Kosse 19 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.30
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.80
Reflection3.80
Respect4.60
Creativity3.80
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.50
Questions3.80
Emma Bornheimer 15 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.00
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.10
Reflection3.90
Respect4.40
Creativity2.93
Feedback3.23
Interaction4.33
Challenge3.40
Questions3.83
Kate Arnold-Murray 16 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.33
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.47
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions4.43
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.