Course record LING
LING 2000
Introduction to Linguistics
University of Colorado Boulder
852 grades22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score50/100
Mixed record
Rachel Farrelly 656 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
656 letter grades
Compare with the course
Farrelly vs. the course average
A
+3.7
B
−1.0
C
−1.9
D
−0.3
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.1% withdrew · 21 of 677 enrolled.
Overall4.48 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Rebecca Kogan Lee 91 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
91 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A
−3.6
B
−3.3
C
+3.6
D
+1.2
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 92 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
104 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.32
Connection5.00
Contribution4.99
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.99
Reflection4.99
Respect4.71
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.99
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Cecily J Duffield 105 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
105 letter grades
Compare with the course
Duffield vs. the course average
A
−20.1
B
+9.1
C
+8.8
D
+0.7
F
+1.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 4 of 109 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Mary Maureen Kosse 39 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.68
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.59
Reflection4.80
Respect4.94
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.66
Questions4.72
Ayden Marzelle Parish 5 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.20
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Elizabeth Goodrich 37 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.41
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.23
Reflection4.58
Respect4.81
Creativity3.91
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.24
Questions4.55
Raichle Farrelly 398 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
398 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.87
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.38
Reflection4.79
Respect4.94
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.82
Questions4.84
Farron Mackenzie Straitz 68 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
68 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Daniel Witness Chen 42 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.50
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.40
Reflection4.42
Respect4.62
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.32
Questions4.71
Natalie Marie Grothues 22 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.65
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.75
Reflection4.95
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.85
Questions4.80
Kanupriya Kale 57 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.93
Connection4.34
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.26
Reflection4.62
Respect4.89
Creativity3.86
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.20
Questions4.72
Kate Arnold-Murray 29 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.65
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.80
Reflection4.60
Respect4.95
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.95
Alexis Ruth Schlagenhauf 33 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.55
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.35
Reflection4.55
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.95
Patrick Das 19 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.45
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Min-Chun Hsiao 56 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
56 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.38
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.28
Reflection4.46
Respect4.71
Creativity4.04
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.42
Questions4.65
Emma Bornheimer 3 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.70
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Jonathan Behr 18 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.87
Contribution4.87
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.77
Reflection4.87
Respect5.00
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.67
Questions5.00
Alexis Palmer 54 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration3.66
Connection4.74
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.68
Reflection4.48
Respect4.85
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.26
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.51
Questions4.65
Chelsea Stencel 4 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration4.85
Connection3.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.35
Grading5.00
Reflection4.85
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.85
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Myron C Stephens 24 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.10
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.53
Reflection4.33
Respect4.67
Creativity3.67
Feedback3.07
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.07
Questions4.03
Gayatri Oke 27 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.23
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.47
Connection4.53
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.83
Grading3.97
Reflection4.63
Respect4.97
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.53
Questions4.73
Sumeyye Nabiev 22 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.47
Questions4.83
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.