Course record LING
LING 1000
Language in U.S. Society
University of Colorado Boulder
1,679 grades27 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score36/100
Below average
Mary Maureen Kosse 97 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
97 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kosse vs. the course average
A
+24.9
B
−18.4
C
−8.1
D
−1.7
F
+3.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.0% withdrew · 4 of 101 enrolled.
Overall4.48 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.97
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.84
Reflection4.88
Respect4.71
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.53
Questions4.88
Chase Raymond 1,005 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
1,005 letter grades
Compare with the course
Raymond vs. the course average
A
+5.5
B
−2.3
C
−2.1
D
−0.2
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
4.4% withdrew · 46 of 1,051 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
402 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.97
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.91
Reflection4.79
Respect4.92
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.19
Challenge4.77
Questions4.93
Kira Hall 146 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
146 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hall vs. the course average
A
−7.9
B
+10.7
C
+2.2
D
−2.4
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 3 of 149 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
134 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.79
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.69
Reflection4.79
Respect4.89
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.69
Questions4.79
Natalie Marie Grothues 184 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
184 letter grades
Compare with the course
Grothues vs. the course average
A
−9.3
B
+4.8
C
+3.0
D
+1.7
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.7% withdrew · 9 of 193 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
147 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology3.86
Synthesis3.67
Collaboration3.16
Connection4.22
Contribution3.36
Discussion3.49
Inclusivity4.52
Grading3.68
Reflection3.74
Respect4.25
Creativity3.85
Feedback2.91
Interaction3.68
Challenge3.86
Questions3.86
Adam Wayne Hodges 181 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
181 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hodges vs. the course average
A
−18.5
B
+4.8
C
+7.7
D
+2.3
F
+3.7
Difference in percentage points.
5.2% withdrew · 10 of 191 enrolled.
Overall4.22 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.60
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Olivia Scrivanich Hirschey 66 grades · 1 term 2.70GPA
66 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hirschey vs. the course average
A
−25.6
B
+12.3
C
+9.0
D
−0.7
F
+5.1
Difference in percentage points.
9.6% withdrew · 7 of 73 enrolled.
Overall4.16 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.65
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.45
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.90
Questions4.50
Meredith Leigh Church 42 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.67
Technology3.86
Synthesis3.69
Collaboration3.43
Connection4.08
Contribution3.62
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity4.13
Grading3.99
Reflection3.68
Respect3.95
Creativity3.77
Feedback3.59
Interaction3.71
Challenge3.62
Questions4.05
Kate Arnold-Murray 117 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
117 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.57
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.94
Reflection4.51
Respect4.92
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.88
Questions4.97
Justin Bai 78 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.50
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.24
Inclusivity4.51
Grading3.99
Reflection4.15
Respect4.47
Creativity4.03
Feedback3.66
Interaction4.44
Challenge4.15
Questions4.26
Kathryn Summerville Conger 12 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.85
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.40
Reflection4.95
Respect5.00
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.