Course record LAWS
LAWS 6109
Trial Advocacy
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score76/100
StrongSean P Finn 9 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.60
Siddhartha Hardas Rathod 13 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.98
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.21
Reflection4.68
Respect4.77
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.95
Questions4.82
Margaret Ann England 79 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.91
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.46
Reflection4.84
Respect4.85
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.92
Questions4.94
Colene Flynn Robinson 117 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
117 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.87
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.91
Reflection4.77
Respect4.80
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.79
Questions4.73
Shandea Jo Williams 18 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.75
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity3.83
Grading3.77
Reflection4.30
Respect4.85
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.38
Questions4.68
Adrienne Gail Greene 12 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.32
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.31
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity2.68
Grading2.55
Reflection4.22
Respect3.50
Creativity4.87
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.27
Questions3.57
Ann England 14 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Christina A W Stanton 7 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Michael Kotlarczyk 7 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.