Course record LAWS

LAWS 6109

Trial Advocacy

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score76/100
Strong

Professors 9 of 9

Sean P Finn 9 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.60
Siddhartha Hardas Rathod 13 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.98
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.21
Reflection4.68
Respect4.77
Creativity4.91
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.95
Questions4.82
Margaret Ann England 79 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

79 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.96
Connection4.91
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.46
Reflection4.84
Respect4.85
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.92
Questions4.94
Colene Flynn Robinson 117 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

117 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.87
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.91
Reflection4.77
Respect4.80
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.79
Questions4.73
Shandea Jo Williams 18 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.75
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity3.83
Grading3.77
Reflection4.30
Respect4.85
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.38
Questions4.68
Adrienne Gail Greene 12 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.32
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.38
Connection4.31
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity2.68
Grading2.55
Reflection4.22
Respect3.50
Creativity4.87
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.27
Questions3.57
Ann England 14 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Christina A W Stanton 7 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Michael Kotlarczyk 7 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.