Course record LAWS
LAWS 6103
Legal Ethics Professionalism
University of Colorado Boulder
682 grades6 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score50/100
Mixed record
Melanie Rebecca Kay 314 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
314 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kay vs. the course average
A
+0.9
B
+1.3
C
−2.1
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.3% withdrew · 1 of 315 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
177 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.90
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.67
Reflection4.63
Respect4.77
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.56
Questions4.84
Melissa Hart 159 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
159 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hart vs. the course average
A
+2.2
B
−0.3
C
−1.4
D
−0.3
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 159 enrolled.
Overall3.53 / 5
100 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.05
Technology2.61
Synthesis2.91
Collaboration2.79
Connection3.54
Contribution3.75
Discussion3.79
Inclusivity3.96
Grading2.07
Reflection2.85
Respect4.04
Creativity2.80
Feedback1.78
Interaction3.75
Challenge2.56
Questions2.39
James C Coyle 27 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
27 letter grades
Compare with the course
Coyle vs. the course average
A
+2.5
B
−0.1
C
−2.1
D
−0.3
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology3.37
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.71
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.32
Reflection4.41
Respect4.61
Creativity4.49
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.64
Questions4.64
Jonathan Patrick Fero 149 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
149 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fero vs. the course average
A
−6.0
B
−0.9
C
+6.0
D
+0.4
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.7% withdrew · 1 of 150 enrolled.
Overall4.50 / 5
91 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.94
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.14
Reflection4.84
Respect4.92
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.75
Questions4.76
Sara Van Deusen 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.59GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 17 enrolled.
Overall4.39 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.80
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Thomas M Ward 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.39GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 16 enrolled.
Overall4.50 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.88
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.63
Reflection4.59
Respect4.86
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.65
Questions4.78
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.