Course record LAWS
LAWS 5646
Foundations of Legal Research
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable12 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score35/100
Below average
Jill A Sturgeon 65 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
65 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.71
Technology4.57
Synthesis3.67
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.46
Contribution3.61
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.37
Reflection4.04
Respect4.58
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.23
Questions4.64
Peter J. Kersten 12 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.20
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Robert Michael Linz 24 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Baylee Suskin 20 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Aamir Shahnawaz Abdullah 78 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.74
Connection4.56
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.49
Reflection4.42
Respect4.64
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.09
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.43
Questions4.60
Staci Pratt 32 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.02
Technology3.95
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration3.54
Connection3.98
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity2.69
Grading3.72
Reflection3.73
Respect4.21
Creativity3.22
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.07
Challenge3.70
Questions4.68
Michelle Penn 35 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.58
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.85
Reflection4.38
Respect4.90
Creativity4.28
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.32
Questions4.88
Michael Whitlow 23 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.09
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.59
Grading4.71
Reflection4.14
Respect4.78
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.72
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.47
Questions4.93
Karen Skinner 37 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.51
Synthesis3.54
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.02
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity3.34
Grading3.68
Reflection3.93
Respect4.56
Creativity3.99
Feedback3.47
Interaction4.68
Challenge3.90
Questions4.51
Shannon Elizabeth Foley 5 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.