Course record LAWS
LAWS 5624
Property
University of Colorado Boulder
683 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score49/100
Mixed record
Kristen Ann Carpenter 58 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
58 letter grades
Compare with the course
Carpenter vs. the course average
A
+5.6
B
−2.7
C
−2.6
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 1 of 59 enrolled.
Overall3.91 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.40
Reflection4.20
Respect4.90
Creativity3.40
Feedback2.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
Kristelia Ann Garcia 56 grades · 1 term 3.43GPA
56 letter grades
Compare with the course
Garcia vs. the course average
A
same
B
+1.1
C
−0.8
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 56 enrolled.
Overall4.50 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Margot E Kaminski 183 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
183 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kaminski vs. the course average
A
+4.5
B
−5.4
C
+0.6
D
same
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.5% withdrew · 1 of 184 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
186 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.83
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.83
Grading4.80
Reflection4.92
Respect4.92
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.92
Questions4.73
Paul F Campos 59 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
59 letter grades
Compare with the course
Campos vs. the course average
A
−3.6
B
+4.9
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 59 enrolled.
Overall2.59 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology1.20
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration1.60
Connection3.80
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.20
Grading1.80
Reflection3.10
Respect3.10
Creativity1.60
Feedback1.40
Interaction2.90
Challenge3.20
Questions2.00
Michael Pappas 141 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
141 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pappas vs. the course average
A
−4.5
B
+6.7
C
−1.9
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 141 enrolled.
Overall4.71 / 5
95 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.80
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.60
Reflection4.79
Respect4.89
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.92
Questions4.54
Craig Konnoth 57 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
57 letter grades
Compare with the course
Konnoth vs. the course average
A
+2.9
B
−5.2
C
+2.6
D
same
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 1 of 58 enrolled.
Overall2.44 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology2.20
Synthesis2.70
Collaboration1.60
Connection3.10
Contribution2.60
Discussion2.80
Inclusivity3.70
Grading2.10
Reflection2.70
Respect3.30
Creativity1.90
Feedback1.70
Interaction2.40
Challenge2.70
Questions2.50
Nadav Orian Peer 105 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
105 letter grades
Compare with the course
Peer vs. the course average
A
−5.9
B
+5.0
C
+0.2
D
same
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 105 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.19
Reflection4.69
Respect4.71
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.78
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.61
Questions4.79
Lua Yuille 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.26GPA
24 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 24 enrolled.
Overall3.49 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.20
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading2.70
Reflection3.50
Respect4.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback2.50
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.70
Questions2.80
Shannon Elizabeth Foley 1 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Interaction5.00
Laura Dolbow 61 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.