Course record JRNL
JRNL 7004
Doctoral Professionalization Seminar
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score78/100
StrongIrma J Fisher 3 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Elizabeth A Skewes 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Patrick Richard Ferrucci 16 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.72
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.63
Reflection4.72
Respect4.91
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.91
Questions4.91
Erin N Willis 4 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Hun Shik Kim 7 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Tobias Hopp 6 reported responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kay Weaver 13 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.88
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.91
Reflection4.70
Respect4.98
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.71
Questions4.97
Christopher Joseph Vargo 7 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.90
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.10
Reflection3.90
Respect4.30
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Ever Josue Figueroa 6 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.