Course record JPNS
JPNS 3110
Advanced Japanese 1
University of Colorado Boulder
153 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score53/100
Mixed recordYumiko Matsunaga 30 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
30 letter grades
Compare with the course
Matsunaga vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
+5.9
C
−5.8
D
−2.0
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 30 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.85
Reflection4.75
Respect4.85
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Yukiko Asano 40 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
40 letter grades
Compare with the course
Asano vs. the course average
A
+6.3
B
−10.7
C
+3.3
D
+0.5
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 40 enrolled.
Overall4.15 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.20
Reflection3.90
Respect4.10
Creativity3.85
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.25
Questions4.00
Hisako Schibli 36 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Schibli vs. the course average
A
−14.5
B
+22.1
C
−6.4
D
−2.0
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.7% withdrew · 1 of 37 enrolled.
Overall4.82 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Kiyomi Kawakami 47 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
47 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kawakami vs. the course average
A
+5.5
B
−11.6
C
+5.7
D
+2.3
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
6.0% withdrew · 3 of 50 enrolled.
Overall4.81 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.97
Reflection4.87
Respect4.93
Creativity4.73
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.83
Questions4.97
Catherine Miki Otachime 11 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Dean Stephen Leininger 9 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.90
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Alyssa Williams 10 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Ann Yoshinaga 35 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.30
Reflection3.90
Respect4.30
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.15
Questions4.30
Haruka Fujii 47 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.70
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.85
Reflection4.73
Respect4.88
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.88
Questions4.93
Juliana Paula Picanco Stracciolano Valverde 10 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.